Portfolio header

Unconventional Ways to Build a GitHub Portfolio (Without Another Todo App)

Most GitHub portfolios look the same: a couple of tutorials, a half-finished side project, and a “CRUD app” that tracks… something. Cool. Totally indistinguishable from the other 30,000 CRUD apps tracking the same thing.

If you want your GitHub to actually communicate skill—engineering judgment, security mindset, real-world constraints—build a portfolio that looks like work you’d do on the job.

Here are a few unconventional (and surprisingly effective) ways to do that.

1) Build a Cloud / Homelab / Hacking Lab — and publish it like it’s production

A good lab repo is basically a “mini company infrastructure” you can point to. It shows you can design systems, automate them, document them, and not leak secrets (hopefully).

What to publish (the portfolio-friendly version)

  • Architecture diagram (Mermaid, draw.io export, whatever)

  • IaC / automation (Terraform, Ansible, Docker Compose, Helm, scripts)

  • Runbooks (how to deploy, rotate creds, recover from failure)

  • Security posture

    • network segmentation notes

    • threat model

    • hardening checklist

    • logging/monitoring approach

  • Cost notes (yes, recruiters love “here’s how I kept it cheap”)

What this proves

  • You can design systems end-to-end

  • You understand operational reality (backups, observability, upgrades)

  • You can communicate clearly (docs, diagrams, decisions)

Safety + sanity rules (don’t self-own)

  • Never commit secrets (use .env.example, placeholder configs)

  • Don’t publish your exact public IPs / exposed services

  • If it’s a “hacking lab,” document it as learning + defense, not “how to break into stuff”

Repo idea: homelab-architecture
Structure idea:

/infra /terraform /ansible /k8s /docs architecture.md threat-model.md runbooks.md backups.md /scripts README.md

2) Publish curated resource lists that don’t suck

“Awesome lists” are everywhere. Most are link dumps that die quietly.

If you want this to count as a real portfolio artifact, make it:

  • opinionated

  • maintained

  • structured

  • useful to a specific audience

Turn curation into engineering

  • Add a taxonomy (categories + tags + difficulty)

  • Include why it matters (1–2 lines per link)

  • Add automation:

    • link checker (GitHub Actions)

    • formatting/linting

    • “new items this month” changelog

Examples of curated collections that stand out

  • “Practical AppSec resources for frontend engineers”

  • “Homelab security checklist + references”

  • “Reverse engineering starter kit (tools + exercises + pitfalls)”

  • “CTF writeups focused on what generalizes”

Repo idea: security-learning-path + GitHub Pages site generated from Markdown.

3) Contribute to OSS strategically (not randomly)

OSS contributions are the easiest “credible signal” you can generate—if you do it intentionally.

Where to look (based on your notes)

Bounty-style OSS is especially portfolio-friendly because it forces:

  • concrete deliverables

  • deadlines and milestones

  • communication

  • quality standards

One key line from your excerpt (and it’s important): “Bounties are awarded to the first person to complete a task.”
Translation: ship clean work, and move.

How to make OSS show up well on GitHub

  • Choose issues with visible impact (docs/test coverage/bugfixes)

  • Write PRs with:

    • clear problem statement

    • before/after behavior

    • screenshots/logs

    • tests (even basic ones)

  • Follow up:

    • respond to reviews

    • iterate fast

    • write a small post: “What I learned fixing X”

Portfolio angle: don’t just “contribute”—document the engineering process.

4) Help your friends (seriously)

If you’re more motivated by helping friends than “improving your portfolio,” good. That’s a cheat code.

Friend projects simulate real work:

  • vague requirements

  • constraints (“it has to run on my old laptop”)

  • feedback loops

  • delivery pressure (someone’s waiting on you)

Make it portfolio-grade

Create a repo (or folder in a mono-repo) for each mini-project:

  • Problem statement

  • Constraints

  • Solution

  • Tradeoffs

  • “If I had 2 more days…” section

Examples:

  • a script that automates invoices

  • a small internal dashboard

  • a data cleanup tool

  • a “one-click deploy” template for their app

This reads like consulting work—because it basically is.

5) Scratch your itch (and publish the trail)

The best side projects start with mild annoyance that won’t go away.

My example :

I want to watch movies with subtitles in another language + hover words + save vocabulary + view translation
Here’s my found existing solutions (Language Reactor and Lingo Player):

That’s already portfolio material—even without building a new app. Otherwise I was ready to do it myself, luckily I was spared.

Three ways to turn “scratch your itch” into GitHub signal

  1. If a solution exists:

    • write a guide: setup + workflow + tips

    • contribute improvements upstream

  2. If it almost exists:

    • build a missing plugin/feature

    • publish an integration repo

  3. If it doesn’t exist:

    • build the smallest working prototype

    • document the decisions + roadmap

Key point: Your GitHub doesn’t need 10 big apps. It needs 2–3 projects with real depth and story.

6) Reverse engineer existing repos/products (ethically) — yes, even password managers

This is underrated. You learn faster, and you prove you can navigate large codebases.

Important boundary: do this on open-source projects or with explicit permission. The goal is understanding and improving—not breaking into anything.

Portfolio-friendly outputs (that won’t get you side-eyed)

  • Architecture diagrams (“how the system works”)

  • Threat model + security review notes

  • Test harness improvements

  • Documentation that clarifies confusing parts

  • Performance profiling notes

  • “Build from source” reproducible setup scripts

A safe format that looks professional

  • “Codebase Tour: X password manager”

    • overview of modules

    • encryption boundaries (high-level)

    • key management concepts (conceptual, not exploit steps)

    • audit checklist

    • suggested improvements (PRs if possible)

This signals: you can read, reason, and communicate about complex systems—one of the most valuable engineering skills.

Package it so people see it

A portfolio isn’t just what you built. It’s how easily someone can evaluate it in 60 seconds.

Minimal “make it obvious” checklist

  • Pin 4–6 repos max

  • Each repo has:

    • 1-paragraph overview

    • screenshots/diagrams

    • “how to run”

    • “what I learned”

  • Use Releases for milestones (v0.1, v0.2…)

  • Add a /docs folder and treat it like a product

A simple 7-day plan (no heroics)

Pick one track and ship something small but complete:

  • Day 1: choose idea + write README skeleton

  • Day 2: basic structure + first commit (diagram or scaffold)

  • Day 3–4: implement one real feature / automation

  • Day 5: docs + runbook + cleanup

  • Day 6: polish + screenshots + release tag

  • Day 7: short blog post: problem → approach → tradeoffs → next steps

That’s already better than 90% of portfolios. Which is a low bar, but still.

<
Blog Archive
Archive of all previous blog posts
>
Blog Archive
Archive of all previous blog posts